Top 5 Lies That the Legacy Media Tell About Kamala Harris
Revisionist History, Lies, and Gaslighting of the American People
As Kamala Harris takes the helm as the Democratic presidential nominee for 2024, the mainstream media has ramped up its efforts to shape her public image. In a bid to bolster her candidacy, several misleading narratives have emerged, designed to protect her from criticism and paint her in a favorable light. Here are the top five ways the media has been accused of distorting the truth to shield Harris as she steps into the spotlight as the party’s standard-bearer.
1. The "Border Czar" Denial
One of the most glaring distortions is the media's attempt to downplay Harris' role as the "border czar." Despite numerous reports from 2021 that identified her as being responsible for addressing the root causes of migration, recent media narratives have sought to distance her from this title, suggesting that she was never officially given the role.
This revisionist approach conveniently ignores her documented involvement and the administration's struggles with border security (Reason.com) (The Daily Signal).
2. Inflating Harris' Popularity
Following President Biden's decision not to seek re-election, some media outlets have been quick to paint Harris as an energetic and appealing alternative. However, this narrative overlooks her historically low approval ratings and lack of traction with key voter demographics, including young voters. Media reports suggesting that Harris is a strong candidate ignore polling data that indicates otherwise, creating a misleading perception of her political viability (Reason.com).
3. Sanitizing Her Political Record
Harris' record, particularly her support for controversial policies like defunding the police and banning fracking, has been softened or omitted in recent media coverage. By downplaying these elements of her history, the media has attempted to present her as a more moderate figure, masking her previous stances that could be unfavorable with the broader electorate. This selective portrayal aims to reframe her past to fit a more palatable narrative (The Daily Signal).
4. Reframing Inauthenticity as a Strength
A common critique of Harris is her perceived inauthenticity, especially her shifting positions on various issues. However, some media outlets have begun to spin this as a positive trait, suggesting that her adaptability is a sign of political savvy rather than a vulnerability. This narrative twist ignores the broader implications of her inconsistent stances, which have been a point of concern for many voters (The Daily Signal).
5. Deflecting Criticism as Racism or Misogyny
The media has often framed criticism of Harris, whether regarding her performance or policies, as being rooted in racism or misogyny. This tactic serves to deflect legitimate critiques and discredits her detractors, creating a protective shield around her candidacy. By dismissing opposition as inherently biased, the media stifles meaningful debate and skews public perception (Reason.com).
These five points highlight the calculated efforts of the mainstream media to not only protect Kamala Harris but also to manipulate public perception in her favor. By rewriting history, inflating her popularity, and dismissing legitimate criticism as mere prejudice, the media is actively gaslighting the American people. This kind of biased reporting undermines the integrity of the democratic process, as it seeks to shield Harris from scrutiny and misleads voters about her true record and capabilities. It's a blatant attempt to control the narrative, one that should alarm anyone who values transparency and truth in journalism.